Contes Macabres

by Josepha Frances Gregg

The New Freewoman: The Individualist Review, vol. 1, issue 12 (1913)

Pages 234-236

Introduction

In 1912, Frances Gregg met John Cowper Powys, and the two fell in love. However, Powys was already married, and, to keep Frances close by, he arranged for her to marry his best friend Louis Wilkinson (Wilkinson 24). By 1913, Frances was living in England with her mother and new husband. Frances Gregg had been friends with writers like Ezra Pound and Hilda Doolittle, both of whom had also moved to England. Doolittle had begun writing under the moniker H.D. and had published several pieces in The New Freewoman. Toward the end of the magazine’s run in 1913, a series of short stories appeared titled “Contes Macabres.” The series consists of three short horror stories, and while not seemingly related, they are united by their haunting themes and personal narrative style, usually in a letter format.

The title of the stories themselves—"Contes Macabres”—gives an idea as to their content. A “conte” is a French word for a short story that is usually imaginative rather than realistic (Merriam Webster). The word “macabres” seems to be a plural version of “macabre,” which can denote the subject of death, a dwelling on the gruesome, and tends to produce horror in the witness (Merriam Webster). So, Frances Gregg’s title literally means “tales of the macabre.” For example, the first short story “My Case” heavily emphasizes blood as the narrator describes “I saw the woods beyond as trees of flame; and the stream, a bloody river and above were great purple birds darting and circling as though it were the play of blood-washed sabres” (Gregg 234). The text also repeats the words “red” and “fire,” which saturates the story with images and descriptions of violence.

From a firsthand account of Frances Gregg by her son Oliver, Powys and Gregg had a sexual relationship that was, at times, sadistic (Wilkinson 23). Oliver explained: “the sadism was largely cerebral: like a dreadful poem. The strange lust was, even so, translated to some extent into flesh. Frances felt violated…” (Wilkinson 23). However, she had been exposed to the horrors of the Antebellum American South. She saw the raw and infant potential in Powys, but was not afraid of him. She indulged his semi-abusive sexual habits to guide him toward his “adult power” (Wilkinson 23). Both Powys and Frances were interested in the macabre, and their experiences and their writing reflected their relationship.

Although it is not known with certainty whether this “Frances Gregg” is the same “Frances Gregg” who wrote the stories in The New Freewoman, evidence suggests that it is her. She moved to England right on time to be there for the publications of the new magazine, and she was good friends with H.D. who knew the editors of the work and was frequently published in it. From what is known of Gregg’s life, the chilling topic of her stories also makes sense based on the life she lived and the people she knew.

The stories also were a good fit for the journal they were published in, because they reflected the Avant Garde themes and literary aspirations of The New Freewoman. Rather than just being a paper that supported women’s rights, the owners and editors of The New Freewoman wanted to challenge the political and social beliefs of the day. They were committed to equality between both men and women and welcomed both sexes to publish with them. Dora Marsden wrote in her opening editor’s note that “The New Freewoman has no cause. The nearest approach to a cause it desires to attain, is to destroy causes…[it] is not for the advancement of Woman, but for the empowering of individuals—men and women…not to create thought but to set free life impulses” (Marsden 25). Eventually the journal became outright anarchistic as it evolved into The Egoist.

Frances Gregg’s macabre tales fit into this magazine of literary talent and forward-thinking ideas precisely because they were so different. Readers of that time would be interested in the psychological horror that comes along with the themes of death, murder and abuse. While today, psychological horror, murder and mystery are a part of everyday entertainment including movies, Netflix documentaries and even podcasts, in Frances Gregg’s time, talking about death, possession, and sexuality was fresh, strange, and to many people very taboo. Frances Gregg’s stories break with tradition and capture psychological elements which were just becoming relevant in the Modernist period.

 

Original Document

  

Transcription

MY CASE

I am normal, absolutely normal. I have always been a sane and balanced person. I have no affectations of dress, the order of my life presents no peculiarities except that I am, perhaps, more exclusive than is customary.

I have said that I was normal, though I have always had an aesthetic appreciation of an unusual kind. But what man of even mediocre genius has not had his foible? Perhaps in this age that denounces any variance from the "normal," as an "abnormality," or “a derangement of the nervous system,” there are those who might say that I was obsessed by the great beauty of Nature’s law of transmutation through decay.

How well I remember the birth of this passion in me.

A boy, a little friend of mine, had strayed from his home. For a week he had been gone, and I, standing at a window, thought of him, and watched the last blood-red glow of the sun. I looked again and again at the fire-ball, and out upon the world through the red mist my eyes retained. I saw the woods beyond as trees of flame; and the stream, a bloody river and above were great purple birds darting and circling as though it were the play of blood-washed sabres. I was so impressed by this notion that I determined to examine them closer.

I left the house and followed the path until I came out upon the river bank. An extraordinary odour assailed me. I drank it in ecstasy. But once again in my life was I to experience so exquisite a moment.

The birds above circled against the now leaden clouds with an extraordinary majesty.

Again[1]Comma not in original text, my senses stirred with an ineffable longing as that odour at once bland and thrilling was borne to me. The vibrating stillness of a forest folded about me. I was confused, bewildered. Instinctively I followed the scent. I walked blindly, with hardly a sense of motion.

And at last I came upon it, the secret of my ecstasy.

There, at my feet, in that little secret hollow where we had last played together, lay the scarred and mutilated body of my little friend.

Child though I was, I had no terror. I can hear again my own soft cries of ecstasy. I knelt down­ I threw myself upon him- I fondled him, calling him by endearing names. In my bliss I got up and danced, and I had what could only have been a Bacchic vision. I seemed to be treading upon great clusters of purple grapes, so that they gave out wine: the heavy blood-red juice dripped from my dancing feet.

I have no clear recollection of what followed. I was found, I and my little companion. I tried to speak of, my joy, but they stopped me and called a physician, believing that my brain had been turned by terror of the night and my discovery. And indeed[2]Comma not in original text, the excitement had produced a dull fever and I lay for many weeks with no great wish to be up again and about, so sweet were my dreams by day and by night.

In the upheaval of adolescence came the inevitable awakening to beauty. Unstable, wearying in my unknown desires. I still had the most subtly diffused and exotic tremors as memory revived the sensations of that night. I lived from that time with but one purpose—to experience again the full joy of possessing some loved creature, made perfect by Nature's last exquisite function.

To will perfectly is to create the desired!

At twenty-five, my reputation was being established. I and my writings were denounced. "Bizarre, neurotic, macabre,” were the mildest of the epithets hurled at me by the eternal public that condemns.

I was living in seclusion, and so might have continued, if I had not been called to assist in settling an estate for a woman who had been my father's ward.

She was not obviously attractive; indeed, in appearance she was curiously baroque. At once beautiful, and trivial: fantastic and common place: weird and laughable: no one, in reality, more innocuous, more normal could have been found, and that with an appearance equivocal, monstrous! Her eyes were dark, opaque, unwinking in their gaze, and with a dull lustre like those of the dead: they were large, menacing, watchful: they never lightened, though her laughter, which was innocent and childlike, gave them an expression of sly lewdness. Nothing could have been more provocative to a man of my temperament. Her startlingly beautiful hair was like copper, giving to her face a delicate greenish pallor. Her mouth was chaste, wistful, exquisite:
she stammered a little.

To look into those lustreless, evil eyes and to watch that quivering mouth, half trembling to a laugh, struggling toward heaven only knew what foulness of utterance- and then to hear some childish platitude, stammered- made me shiver with ecstatic and terrible laughter.

What a creature! At this moment as I write, after all these years, I quiver and throb with excitement at the vision of her. She was so frail, so exquisite, her body swayed so lightly when she walked, and she had a way, a little gesture all her own, of holding her slender hands before her, groping, as it were, through the most brilliant sun as though, being dead, with tenuous pathetic fingers she parted the crowding ghosts.

Then those implacable, baleful eyes, that morbid pallor, as though she had been formed of the corruption of dead bodies—that suggestion of depravity, that delicious intimation of perverted instincts. To will perfectly, is indeed to create the desired! She was my creation, my manifest thought, the perfect tribute to my genius!

I took her home. She had few wants as far as I could judge; I knew very little about her. I believe she was unhappy. I have some idea that her impulses and desires were quite normal. I was incapable of interest in such matters.

My work occupied a certain amount of my time morning and afternoon, but it was my pleasure to have her with me during the long evenings. It was our custom to sit late over the fire, with little light in the room.

I gloated over her, I devoured her. She spoke rarely, but my prolonged surveys must have troubled her; she was intimidated, as are animals under like provocation; occasionally she wept, and wrung her hands, the lids half dropped over those malevolent eyes.

These exquisite moments were, as Fate willed it, so rare as to be numbered, for blindness, the incipient secret of her strange eyes, fell upon her. From that time she became more passive, pliant without a murmur to my will, but unavoidably less interesting. The unreal, the ideal, the potential, are the artist's medium. Had she been as lewd, as corrupt, as her eyes promised, she would have bored me to extinction; and equally, to be forced to realise that her enigmatical, suggested vice and perversion, was but the result of a defect of vision—! Her groaning gestures, having now their obvious cause, ceased to delight me with their pathos, —and her health, now that blindness had actually come upon her, seemed to improve; her pallor gave way to a delicate flush—but tinted flesh had never any charm for me.

For several weeks I worked quietly and alone, but the habit I had formed of having her near me in the evening, troubled me, and in the end I sent for her. She came reluctantly. I said, “We are alone." She gave a cry[3]Comma after cry in original text, a soft wail, and groped for some way of escape.

If she had gained colour, now, with her terror, she was pale enough to excite me to a very frenzy of my peculiar lust.

She crouched, whimpering like a hurt animal, against the wall.

Her little cries—when I think of her little cries—!

In the morning she was gone, she had disappeared like a wraith, without sound, slipped off, wandered away, nobody knew what had become of her. We made what effort we could to trace her, but what can one do in the heart of barren country? My man dragged the little pond, his old wife wandered through the wood, weeping and calling for her. With me they were surly and fearful. I also searched.

Three days passed, and in the evening, just at sunset, I found her.

I had been walking at the foot of the garden, watching the red glow of the sunset; the fields stretched before me as though bathed in blood; above me were blood-red clouds. My eyes were arrested by the glory of the light reflected in the window of the turret room—the great pane of glass glowed like molten metal. I felt impelled to go up, to gaze out upon the sun-flooded world from that high point.

It was there that I found her.

Wounded, as he had been—the little boy of whom I have spoken. I do not know how it had happened. She may have had a lover. As I have said, I knew very little of her. She was gentle, clinging, and could have been easily murdered.

FINIS.

 

CONDEMNED TO DIE.

"Nobody will believe me—nobody—nobody—and yet I am telling the truth. How strange that one should be telling the truth and yet not be believed. How can that happen? I ask God how that can happen. To-morrow I am to die—and I am young--- I am young. It was the first night of our marriage. How did it happen? I tell you it was the devil's work. Has the devil conquered God?

She is dead—but there would have been another maybe. How can I die—I ask you how can I die to-morrow?

It happened so.

She was a big girl, strong, with a way of holding her head like a colt not yet broken. She was all brown and red, and I loved her. And yet, there came times when I would draw back from her with foreboding, and she was like a great lady.

At the marriage, she was confused, and strange, and distraught. And at the supper, she would touch nothing.

It was about three hours before the dawn when the guests left us. We stood a moment at the door, and heard the leaves stir, and the faint sleepy twittings of the birds. Then a wind moaned above the roof and she clung to me frightened while I dropped the bar.

She softened. Then of a sudden she gave a cry and beat on the air with her hands. I turned, but there, was nothing. And when I turned again, my girl had gone, she looked like a lady born! She seemed grown taller. She had her heard thrown back and lifted like a queen.

And then she spoke—and her voice like ice. She said: "She shall die, sooner than that I shall have no body."

And with that commenced a struggle, such as no other human eyes have known. For her hands, my girl's strong hands, seized upon her throat, her thumbs upon the windpipe.

And I stared, dazed, till it came to me that my girl was being strangled, and that not by herself. Then for one moment came my girl's face, and she cried:

“Oh, save me, save me!"

I sprang to her, and we swayed back and forth, and struggled, I striving to unloose her hands. And always the face changing swiftly—my girl, then not my girl, till I grew mad with horror, and caught out my knife to strike at those strangling fingers. And the sight of the blood sickened me—and the thing became a nightmare. I could only pray: “God, wake me from my dream!"

And her face, when it came, was all terror, like a child's: and the other was malignant fury.

And at the back of my mind, quite clear and sharp, I was saying: “What a pity!" for all this time we were crushing and breaking those little things that we had bought together in such gay humour; and there was one, a pitcher, that smashed and lay like a flower, pink with white edges, and my mind said: "What a pity!'' And that was strange.

So we struggled, hours, or minutes maybe, till her clothing was torn from her. But what was human frailty against the strength of devils!

And the end came, and my girl's face was blackened, and the blood all trickling down from her fingers where my knife had cut.

And that demon spoke again, looking hate out of my girl's eyes at me: "I have conquered and—I die," she said.

And then it was my girl again, and she sobbed, "Take me!" like a tired child, and died.

“I beg you, make” the judges say, “how the marks came so upon her throat. "

 

A LETTER.

Therese, my very dear one,

At last I write you a letter. You have been patient. That I should so repay your patience!

But hear me.

It is now six months since I saw you. I have not recovered. Indeed[4]Comma after “Indeed” not included in original text, my malady strikes deeper!

We should now have been two months married. Therese, my beautiful, no human creature could have drawn me from you.

I am haunted.

What can be done for me?

I have always another about me. Another who wails and weeps continually. This other is a woman, a great blob of sensitive fibre. Yet why do I revile her, I love her, I have possessed her.

You say, "but she has no existence.” She has not, but I have possessed her soul: daily, I ravish her spirit. With exquisite anguish we flame together, till I am like molten stuff, like molten pain. I cannot describe it.

Once I went everywhere, did all things. I was young, I was healthy. You will forgive me, you know of old, my horror of disease, my pride that I was healthy. Now, under this strain, the head grows weary, and I suffer from ill-health.

You will say, “go out, go again among people, diversion is good for you." But I cannot, I must protect her.

You must understand, she has no existence apart from me. I am like a tree with two great branches. From the waist up I am double. She is contained in me: I am built about her, as though one ring were encased in another. So, when I sit at my desk, she may throw herself forward, arms outstretched, head bowed, weeping. Then I can see her dimly.

It is grotesque, and hideous—and beautiful.

You must understand, she suffers continually, a very nightmare of pain, and I suffer with her. She has—how am I to make it plain to you—she sees clearly. She has no safeguard of convention and tradition. All the horrors of lust and disease she feels and knows.

Think, my Therese, you who have been shielded and protected by ignorance, by fraud, by tradition, think what it must mean to see clearly the world as it is.

Looking back, I know it was a year ago that I first realised her. You remember, how I changed suddenly from gaiety and light living and became the sullen, morose, unhappy fellow that I am. I did not know then that she existed, but only that I could go nowhere without seeing misery. I saw victims, victims, victims, of lust, of brutality, of self-seeking. All my friends became different: you alone, my dear, were unchanged. Tortured, maimed animals were about my feet: I wandered in strange parts of the city without volition: I stood in brothels where children were the victims.

I went to old haunts of my own pleasure. All was changed. Where, where, where were the lights, the gay women, the flair, the panache, of the half-world? Where, in that muck of brutal, sordid living, that cesspool of cadaverous vice, was the thread of beauty, the Rabelaisian good humour that we have been taught existed?

Wherever I turned, blighted children, sickly midgets, blind, lame imbecile, shrieked "Lust!" at me.

The social system became suddenly vivid, important to me: and I writhed in my bed in the dim mornings, while a great army of miners, factory women, labourers, mechanics filed past me uttering moans and cries of anguish.

I decided upon suicide.

You remember, when I left you six months ago? When I raised the pistol, I felt—I saw—but how shall I tell you, for it is neither feeling nor seeing— I was conscious of an exquisite, sorrowful face, all the pain of the world incarnate. Quivering, pathetic fingers arrested my action, lips sought mine unsteadily, the lower lip caught in as though with the breath of a sob. All this I got vividly, and with a great sense of relief. The unknown that had haunted me was, at last, known and living. The lips met my own.

Therese, my dear one, I tell you there are a thousand exquisite sensations, subtle and strong, that we with our coarse grain do not comprehend. Our love, our lust, are but the beginning of what the future will know.

When I think of the grotesque clumsiness of our endeavours toward pleasure and sensation, compared to the darting, flickering, biting flame of my new medium, I look upon man as but little advanced beyond the animal, for all of his boasted "progress and civilization.”

What colossal stupidity, what monstrous duplicity, has reduced us to this?

Through her eyes I see things, I see how all our beautiful instincts have been distorted by treason, by those great lies of the brute world to betray us. The great warring of the brute-world and of consciousness is always about us.

I could not endure my impatience and horror were it not for her kisses, her union with me, her beauty beyond beauty to stay me.

To see things as they are—

What devastation!

She has shown me cruelty, that delicate poignard of the Earth-mother, become brutality, a thing that maims, bruises, and shatters, without beauty.

She is complete pain and perfect Beauty. But I am not strong enough to bear it.

She suffers too much. It is through my eyes that she sees. I shall blind myself to save her. I shall have her kisses and memory to drag through the years with.

I shall sign this in my blindness to show that I am recovered.

My great love to you.

You will have understood.

 

Topics

Voyant Corpora

Open this title in Voyant Tools

Digital Literary Analyses

Francis Gregg and Horror Feminism

How To Cite (MLA Format)

Gregg, Josepha Frances. "Contes Macabres." The New Freewoman: The Individualist Review 1, 12 (1913): 234-6. Edited by Sarah Jensen. Modernist Short Story Project, 19 May 2024, https://mssp.byu.edu/title/contes-macabres/.

Contributors

Sarah Jensen
Morgan Lewis Sarah Jensen

Posted on 27 April 2019.

Last modified on 16 May 2024.

References

References
1, 2 Comma not in original text
3 Comma after cry in original text
4 Comma after “Indeed” not included in original text